Bug Hunting as a Service, an alternative to traditional Pentesting
The traditional practice of penetration testing is not always the most efficient and comprehensive solution for your needs; a modern alternative could be bug hunting as a service.
Penetration testing and bug bounty hunting are two different approaches to identifying vulnerabilities in a system or application, but they have slightly different purposes, methodologies, and contexts. Here are the main differences between the two:
- Purpose:
- Penetration Test: Penetration tests are conducted with the specific goal of assessing the security of a system or application at a given time. The objectives can be specific, such as finding vulnerabilities in an application or assessing the overall resilience of an infrastructure.
- Bug Bounty Hunting: Bug bounty hunting involves researchers or security groups looking for vulnerabilities in systems or applications in exchange for monetary rewards. The main goal is the discovery and reporting of bugs, and the program is often ongoing for an extended period.
- Methodology:
- Penetration Test: Penetration tests often follow a structured and planned methodology. Security experts perform a series of manual and automated tests to discover vulnerabilities, and the results are documented in a detailed report.
- Bug Bounty Hunting: Bug bounty hunting is more flexible and informal. Bug hunters can use any method they deem effective to find vulnerabilities. There are no fixed rules on methodology, although there are general guidelines.
- Reporting and Communication:
- Penetration Test: The results of penetration tests have a very formal structure and are illustrated in a report that details:
- The specific vulnerabilities that were exploited.
- The sensitive data that was obtained.
- The amount of time the tester was able to remain in the system
- Penetration Test: The results of penetration tests have a very formal structure and are illustrated in a report that details:
Bug Bounty Hunting: Bug hunters typically report vulnerabilities to bug bounty platforms, which then communicate the details to the interested organization.
In the case of NgSecurity's Bug Bounty as a Service, since no external Bug Bounty platform is involved, the information about bugs is communicated directly to the organization with a simple communication describing the Bug, accompanied by a video as proof.
- Compensation:
- Penetration Test: Penetration tests have a fixed cost that varies based on the size of the target and not on the number or severity of vulnerabilities found, so even if no bugs are detected, the company is required to pay the full amount.
- Bug Bounty Hunting: A very low monthly fee is paid for participation in the program, and bug hunters are compensated only based on the vulnerabilities found. Rewards vary based on the severity of the bugs found, which are predefined based on a standard taxonomy.
- Duration:
- Penetration Test: Penetration tests are usually scheduled for a defined period and can be a one-time or recurring event.
- Bug Bounty Hunting: Bug bounty programs can be ongoing for an indefinite period, sometimes for years.
In summary
While penetration testing is a more formal and structured approach to assessing security, bug bounty hunting is a more flexible approach involving researchers looking for vulnerabilities with the goal of obtaining rewards.
Both approaches can be useful for improving the security of a system or application when used appropriately.
Bug Hunting as a Service by NGsecurity
NGsecurity offers an innovative solution to Bug Bounty Hunting.
Since there are no external platforms involved where subscription fees are very high and suitable only for companies with large budgets, in the case of Ng Security's bug bounty as a service, the subscription fee is very low.
There is the possibility to set a monthly cap; if the cap is reached in a month, the service will be suspended and automatically reactivated the following month.
This approach allows for defining maximum monthly costs.